|
American intervention in Somalia (1993) ... and lessons learned Clinton's efforts to bring peace between Israel and Palestine (1993) Restoring Haiti's presidency (1993-1994) Ethnic cleansing in Rwanda (1994) Ethnic cleansing in Bosnia (1991-1995) The Kosovo Crisis (1999) Relations with former Cold War rival Russia now seem to be quite warm Diplomatic progress in Europe Saddam Hussein's Iraq Problems brewing in the Muslim world The textual material on this webpage is drawn directly from my work America – The Covenant Nation © 2021, Volume Two, pages 323-334. |
|
"Black Hawk down" in Somalia (1993)
Clinton's first serious venture into foreign affairs turned out to be a disaster, but thankfully only a small disaster. The country Somalia was caught in a massive civil war among contending tribes and religious groups, and was turning into a humanitarian disaster as warring political factions confiscated the United Nations food donations sent to relieve the starving Somali civilian population. In October of 1993, in order to bring better protection to the U.N. relief effort, Clinton ordered a land and helicopter assault from offshore aircraft carriers on one of the major warlords. But two Black Hawk helicopters were shot down and a rescue attempt was itself badly battered by resisting Somalis. The Americans eventually pulled out as best they could. The whole thing was reminiscent of Reagan's attempt to referee the infighting in Lebanon in 1982-1983. Despite the obvious humanitarian intentions of both interventions, they both suffered from a violent resolve of local fighting groups not to let these "outsiders" succeed in placing their police powers over their country. The complexities of nation-building Westerners, especially Americans, have always seen great honor in their interventions abroad, undertaken with the high moral intentions of bringing peace to a society caught up in terrible infighting, sometimes even precipitated by the Americans themselves when they see fit to overthrow – in the name of democracy – some national dictator. Americans have always been expecting that somehow such intervention in the name of the freedom of the little people would bring the wonderful experience of social justice to their society – and thus ultimately win the hearts of that population. When this does not happen automatically, dismay – rather than resolve to understand the underlying dynamic – is the result. This does not mean that such intervention should never be attempted. It only means that "nation-building," which is what is actually going on in these efforts, is a highly complex matter involving the complicated putting in place of a workable status quo where obviously one has broken down or has never possessed much strength and thus stability, or has been dependent entirely on the power of a single individual, thus to Americans, by very definition, a dictator. However, "democracy" never happens automatically, through some kind of spontaneous movement of the little people, freed up (by the American intervention) to now be able to move forward as by some deep human instinct toward some kind of orderly society. Inevitably the peace and social stability America is looking for does not come about until a new set of social "enforcers" are put in place, ones who are able gradually to institute a new rule of some kind of social order that the people can readily understand, thus one built on their longer political-cultural norms, whatever they might be, not on America's ideas of what those should be. There are going to be firefights among militant wannabes who seek to be the ones privileged to put that new order in place. Outsiders are going to get caught in the middle of the firefights, and are either going to have to impose their own sense of order (which constitutes imperialism) or simply stand back and wait for all the killing to subside and the social-political dust to settle to be able to deal in some kind of orderly fashion with the winners of the contest. This does not fit the American Idealist, Humanist, or Liberal view of human nature and how it is supposed to work, that is, social progress through simple "appeal to Reason." This is because domination, not reason (although "reason" always finds a way eventually to assign moral justification to such domination), is what secures social life. President Wilson never figured this out about the Paris peace treaties and why the English and French refused to be "reasonable" in their treatment of Germany in 1919. Presidents Kennedy and Johnson (and the Democratic Congress of the early 1970s) did not understand this about Vietnam. President Carter took too long to figure this out about Iran. Reagan learned fast in Lebanon. Bush Sr. understood, and refused to get drawn into nation-building in Iraq. As we shall see in the next chapter, Bush Jr. however did not – and everyone paid a huge price for Bush Jr.'s lack of political-cultural sophistication. For that matter, American intellectuals of the Idealist, Humanist, or Liberal variety have never understood – or even wanted to understand – this hard reality, the one that dictated the manner of the founding of Anglo-American society in the New World, and its expansion across the North American continent, from the Atlantic to the Pacific. The sheer "imperialism" of it all has been a constant affront to their religious belief in the reasonableness of man and the Humanist view that violence is automatically evil – because it makes a mockery of Human Reason. The facts of the founding and expanding of Anglo-American culture are consequently too uncomfortable (actually even shameful) for them to be willing to accept. And thus they have the constant emotional need to apologize for the American past, even for the very existence of America itself, and seek all kinds of moral amends to make things right. Indeed, the shaming of America seems to have become one of their major occupations in life, as if this somehow might change the way Reality works – and finally justify their Humanist religion. Nonetheless Clinton learned quickly through his Somali venture the hard lessons about political Reality (his Georgetown training was probably also a big help in this regard). Clinton would not totally reject the challenge of nation-building. But he would be better-equipped in the future to deal with the actual dynamics of such an enterprise.
|
|
The Oslo Accords, September 1993
Also to Clinton's great credit, in 1993 it looked as if Clinton might have pulled off the amazing agreement of Israel and the Palestinians to work together with the signing of the Oslo Accords – except that in November of 1995 a fanatical arch-conservative Jew, Yigal Amir, assassinated the Israeli Prime Minister, Yitzak Rabin, for having moved to accommodate the Palestinians. Israeli-Palestinian tensions thus returned "back to normal."
|
The Oslo Accords attempt to secure an Israeli-Palestinian Peace
Yitzhak Rabin, Bill Clinton
and Yasir Arafat formalizing the Oslo Accords in Washington, D.C.
September
3, 1993.
Yitzak Rabin ... and a photo of his
being shot and killed (November
4, 1995)
by a right wing extremist Jewish
student Yigal
Amir
Mourning Yitzhak Rabin
|
In 1994 in Haiti, Clinton was faced with a rapidly deteriorating situation when a military junta – one that had overthrown Haiti's first-ever popularly-elected government of Jean Bertrand Aristide several years earlier – was holding on to power through very repressive means. This event had set Haitians in huge numbers (tens of thousands) fleeing the country, heading for America by sea, but with many of the overloaded and unseaworthy boats sinking along the way. The sheer horror of it all caused the United Nations to call for the restoration of the elected government of Aristide – and again to look to America for help. But in this matter, Clinton was again inclined to be quite circumspect, because of the Somali disaster. Sensing however that he had the broader support of the Haitian people themselves in this matter, Clinton finally decided that the situation in Haiti could be fairly rapidly reversed with some American intervention, and sent representatives (former President Carter, General Colin Powell of Gulf War fame, and Senator Nunn) to Haiti to let the junta know that if the Haitian military did not immediately return Aristide to power, U.S. troops would be sent to their country and bring about the same result. The junta however thought it might just be a bluff, and did not respond to the threat. Thus in September Clinton ordered the shipment of 20,000 U.S. troops of the 82nd Airborne Division to Haiti. Finally, as the ships drew closer to Haiti, the Haitian military understood that Clinton was not bluffing. Consequently, the Haitian military backed down, agreeing to restore Aristide to power the next month, under the protection of U.S. troops that were indeed put ashore in Haiti to oversee this transfer of power. The U.S. troops were then soon pulled out. Clinton came away from this venture looking very presidential.
|
Aristide on his return to Haiti
Troops restore Aristide in Haiti – 1994
|
In 1994 in Rwanda, the government (mostly of the Hutu tribe) conducted a campaign of ethnic cleansing (almost a million people killed in this tiny country) against the Tutsi tribesmen. An appeal went out for the West to help. But this time Clinton reasoned that this event had more the character of the Somali situation than the Haitian situation, and simply refused to get involved. It was too big. He drew a lot of fire from Liberals for his insensitivity. But he was undoubtedly quite correct in not dragging the country into something this big, and rather remote from America's direct interests.
|
|
When Yugoslavian President Tito died in 1980, a wide variety of South Slav national groups fell into infighting. In the early 1990s some of these groups (Roman Catholic Croats and Slovenians) declared independence from Serb-dominated Yugoslavia (largely Eastern or Serbian Orthodox Christians). Bosnia-Herzegovina also declared independence (1991), except that this area included a very large Serbian minority (31 percent). The Yugoslavian Serbs refused to recognize this independence and moved into Bosnia, which was also 44 percent Muslim (ethnic Slavic, although thanks to several centuries of Turkish domination, mostly Sunni Muslim in religion), 17 percent Croat, and 8 percent "other") to link up with their fellow Bosnian Serbs – sparking a savage civil war in Bosnia. The Serbs hit particularly hard the Muslim areas of Bosnia, attempting to either kill or force into flight all Muslims from the region (some 8,000 Muslim men and boys were killed in the town of Srebrenica alone in 1995). Of course the Muslims struck back where possible. The beautiful multi-ethnic Bosnian capital, Sarajevo, the site of the 1984 Olympic winter games, was turned into a bombed-out city. Subsequent ethnic cleansing drew the condemnation of both the United Nations and the Western European countries. But there was little they could do militarily, unless they employed NATO in some kind of peace-keeping policing capacity. For that they would need American leadership. At first Clinton was hesitant to act militarily (he had embargoed military sales to the Serbs), partly still remembering the trouble U.S. forces had got themselves into in Somalia. But by 1995, atrocities in Bosnia had become so bad – and such a threat to the general peace and stability of Europe – that Clinton finally agreed to use NATO air power against the Serbs in order to protect the Bosnian Muslim towns and countryside from wholesale slaughter. Military aid to the Muslims coming from other Muslim countries, plus help from the Croatian military, put ground troops in action against the Serbs. Finally toward the end of 1995 an armistice, then a formal peace treaty (the Dayton Accords), backed up by the placing of a 60,000-troop monitoring force (which included 20,000 U.S. troops) brought an uneasy peace to the area. By this time a quarter of a million people had been killed and more than a million made homeless by the war. Clinton hoped to achieve a multi-ethnic Bosnia with its own government. But his NATO allies were dubious that this would hold without long-term NATO enforcement, and preferred simply to let Bosnia be subdivided by ethnic areas of Muslim, Serb and Croat sectors. Also the NATO force, supposedly there for just one year, had to be continued, although it was reduced to half the original size. Here seemed to be an example of limited but moderately effective nation-building. It had proved very costly. But it seemed to settle this horrible crisis that had exploded right in the heart of Southern Europe. And Clinton's America had clearly played the key leading role in the event.
|
The building of the Parliament
of Bosnia and Herzegovina burns
after being hit by Serbian
tank fire during the siege in 1992
Sarajevo itself became a slaughterhouse as hostile forces fired across
streets,
catching civilians in the cross-fire.
that it is time for America to act ... to end this European
tragedy
A US F14 tomcat fighter takes off on a patrol over Bosnia from the aircraft carrier USS Theodore Roosevelt
August 1995 – NATO airstrike of a Serbian ammunition depot in Bosnia
The signing of the Dayton Accords by
the presidents of Bosnia, Croatia and Serbia
in Ohio – November 21, 1995 ... organized by US chief negotiator Richard Holbrooke
and Secretary of State Warren
Christopher
The final peace agreement is signed in
Paris December 14, 1995.
Seated are Slobodan Milošević (Serbia), Franjo Tudjman
(Croatia), and Alija Issetbegovic
(Bosnia Herzegovina). Standing
behind them are Felipe Gonzalez (Spanish Prime Minister),
Bill Clinton,
Jacques Chirac (French President), Helmut Kohl (German Chancellor),
John Major (British Prime Minister) and Viktor Chernomyrdin. (Russian
Prime Minister)
|
Then in 1999 tensions flared up again in the former Yugoslavia. This time it shifted to the southern Serbian province of Kosovo where the vast majority of the population was ethnically Albanian and Muslim in religion. Once again it was a Serbian policy of attempting to remove non-Serbs from the region through a program of ethnic cleansing that sparked a new civil war. This time Clinton took the lead to call for action against the Serbs, and immediately NATO responded with an intense precision-bombing campaign that ravaged Serb troops and military sites. Even the Serb capital of Belgrade was bombed extensively to force the Serbs to back off (they had driven over a million Albanians out of their homes and into neighboring countries as refugees). Finally Serbian President Milosevich had to admit defeat. He agreed to remove his Serb troops from the Kosovo Province and allow another NATO-staffed United Nations peacekeeping force (50,000 troops, including 7,000 Americans) to police the province. Milosevich was subsequently arrested as a war criminal and sent to The Hague, where he died in a Dutch prison during his long trial. And an 11-foot gold-colored statue of Bill Clinton, atop an even taller pedestal, now sits in the center of Priština, the capital of independent Kosovo, honoring the man who helped stop the ethnic cleansing going on there!
|
The 1999 NATO bombing of Serbia's capital Belgrade
A statue of Bill Clinton in downtown Pristina, Kosovo's capital city!
|
Clinton enjoyed friendly relations with Boris Yeltsin, President of the old national rival Russia – although Americans generally stayed removed from Russian events as Russia moved toward "democracy." Once again Americans tended to believe that democracy, being the natural instinct of man, would take care of itself in Russia now that the oppressive restraints of the Soviet system had been lifted. Once again Americans were wrong. The Russian experiment with democracy was a huge disappointment to multitudes of Russians who did not understand the personal duties and responsibilities that democracy requires, but did understand that the state no longer sent them their pension checks and that their alcoholic President Yeltsin seemed to be more interested in enjoying himself than in taking care of his people – which, to be taken care of, is what Russians by tradition expect of any government, whether Tsarist, Communist, or Democratic. By the end of the 1990s, Russians (though by no means all of them, for there were a number of younger, entrepreneurial Russians making great economic gains in all this freedom) were becoming disenchanted with Russia's attempt to join Western culture.
|
President Bill Clinton
plays the saxophone presented to him by
Russian President Boris Yeltsin
at a private dinner hosted
by President Yeltsin
at Novoya Ogarova Dacha, Russia – 13 January
1994
Yeltsin and Clinton having a good laugh together during Yeltsin's visit to the US in 1995
|
The European Union
In 1993 the foundation of the European Community was strengthened in another step toward full political union with the coming into force of the Maastricht Treaty. The biggest change that came with the remake of the Community as the European Union was the decision to abandon the members' national currencies (the British, as often the case, not willing to move forward to that extent) such as the mark, the franc, the lira, etc. – and instead to adopt an all-European single currency, the euro. Soon thereafter (1995) three European countries that had long taken a rather "neutral" position in the Cold War, Sweden, Finland and Austria, also joined the European Union, bringing the total membership to fifteen in number. The expansion of NATO In March of 1999 the Czech Republic, Hungary and Poland were added to NATO. The following year the rest of the former members of the Soviet-dominated Warsaw Pact of East Europe ... as well as the Baltic states of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania petitioned to join NATO (they were finally brought into the alliance formally in 2004). This now extended the reach of NATO deep into Eastern Europe, once the sphere of influence or dominance of Russia. Russia objected, but was not in a position to stop the expansion. By 2017 the total number of NATO members stood at twenty-nine.1 1The
original members who joined in 1949 were Belgium, Canada, Denmark,
France, Iceland, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal,
the United Kingdom and the United States. They were joined by Greece
and Turkey in 1952, West Germany in 1955, and Spain in 1982. Several of
the new states drawn from the former Yugoslavia would also join in 2004
and 2009. Ukraine also wanted to join – but that was considered too
provocative to the Russians and thus no action was taken. Sweden,
Finland, Austria and Switzerland chose to stay out of NATO as European
"neutrals."
|
|
|
Afghanistan's "Taliban"
Indeed, events in the second half of the 1990s that would soon come to have great significance to America were taking place in Afghanistan, events which at the time drew little attention from the world (except from the CIA which was watching developments closely). A group of religious diehards, the Taliban, were in the process of taking over all but the very northern portions of Afghanistan. Afghanistan was well-recognized as being a relatively ungovernable country, inhabited by numerous tribes and ethnic groups with a long history of mutual hatred. Since the downfall of the Afghan Shah in 1973 Afghanistan had been, with frequent Soviet interference, ruled by various mutually hostile factions of the Afghan Communist Party. Then with the final collapse of the pro-Soviet government and the creation in 1992 of the Islamic State of Afghanistan, the schisms switched from ideological differences to strictly personal, tribal and ethnic differences, merely continuing the politically unstable situation. The Pashtun tribesmen, living in the south and southeast of the country, were the largest of the ethnic groups – and long-accustomed to running the country, even though they comprised only a little over 40% of the Afghan population. Tajiks made up not quite 30%, Hazara not quite 10%, Uzbeks also not quite 10%, and the other 10% a mixture of other tribes. Afghanistan was thus not truly a nation, but merely a collection of nations – which made the idea of building a democracy in Afghanistan very complicated, if not totally unlikely to ever come to pass. With the creation in 1992 of the Islamic State of Afghanistan, the country was plunged into a vicious civil war, with various alpha males representing Afghanistan's various tribal groups fighting among themselves, switching loyalties as their perceived self-interests shifted back and forth. But in 1994 the civil war was joined by yet another small group of mostly Pashtuns, formed around the leadership of an Islamic fundamentalist teacher, the mullah Muhammad Omar, and his students or taliban. The Taliban were mostly Afghans who had originally fled Afghanistan and had established themselves with the Mullah Omar in the Pastun regions of Pakistan.2 The Taliban began to grow rapidly in number, drawing madrasah (religious school) students and young ideologically-inspired militants from among the huge Afghan refugee population in Pakistan. But it also began to draw membership from Islamic fundamentalists from all around the Muslim world because of its well-known commitment to the strictest form of shari'a, Islamic social and religious law. Also, various elements of the Pakistani government, particularly its intelligence service, the ISI (Inter-Services Intelligence), began to give considerable support to the Taliban. In 1994 the Taliban crossed from Pakistan into Afghanistan and easily seized the key southern city of Kandahar (well placed within Pashtun territory) – where the political reach from Afghanistan's capital city Kabul had been virtually non-existent anyway. The Taliban then made Kandahar the center of their operations. They became famous for their ruthless grip over the local population, imposing the strictest Islamic political order through a reign of Islamic terror: conducting executions for various offenses, especially ones committed by women. Local Shi'ites (disdained by the Sunni Taliban who considered all Shi'ites as heretics) and ethnic Hazaras (whom the Pastun looked down on as a greatly inferior class of people) also came under the wrath of the Taliban (tens of thousands were simply executed for the sin of being Shi'ite or Hazara). But this brutal intimidation of the local population worked. Villages were afraid to come up against the Taliban. And soon the southern or Pashtun section of Afghanistan fell under their strict rule. Attempts were made by the Kabul government, in particular by Afghan Defense Minister, Ahmed Shah Massoud, to draw the Taliban into a national coalition. But the Taliban were not interested. With strong support coming from the governments of Pakistan and Saudi Arabia – and from a new Pakistani-based jihadist organization, al-Qaeda – the Taliban were able to advance their troops on the capital Kabul. In September of 1996 they surrounded the city, forcing the government to evacuate and retreat to the northern provinces, where what was left of the original Afghan government managed to continue to hold out under the leadership of Massoud. The United Front or Northern Alliance Afghans soon were streaming north to the Massoud-led "Northern Alliance" in order to escape the on-going massacre by the Taliban. By 2001 over a million refugees had fled various parts of Afghanistan to find refuge in Massoud's north. And Massoud had begun efforts to organize this chaotic situation into something of a stable, western style republic which he hoped would soon bring the country out of the increasingly harsh rule of the Taliban. Meanwhile Pakistan, once a modernizing, staunchly pro-Western ally, was sending tremendous amounts of aid to the Taliban. From the American point of view this made little sense, for certainly Pakistan had to realize the danger that the Taliban presented to Pakistan's own government. Presumably Pakistan believed that by backing the Taliban, they had this militant organization under better Pakistani control. That would prove to be a very wrong assumption. Al-Qaeda (or more properly al-Qa'ida) Another jihadist group with a huge global mission, even beyond the Middle East, was Arab al-Qaeda. It was founded in the late 1980s by Sunni Arab Muslims through another organization, Egyptian Islamic Jihad, but was heavily supported with Saudi Arabian financing – and led by a Saudi expatriate, Osama bin Laden. Bin Laden (son of a very wealthy Saudi construction contractor) took refuge in the Sudan in 1992 after being expelled from his native Saudi Arabia by the Saudi king because bin Laden had been loud and long in his verbal attacks on the Saudi government for permitting American troops to be stationed in the country during the 1991 Gulf War. According to Islam, all of Arabia is holy ground. The stationing of kaffirs (infidel or unbelievers) anywhere in Arabia is a great sin against Allah. But the Saudi king knew he needed the presence and protection of American troops in Saudi Arabia against the expansionist designs of Saddam Hussein. Thus Bin Laden's unrelenting religious purism had become intolerable to the Saudi royal family. At the same time, the military government of the Sudan initially proved very supportive of bin Laden's sense of religious mission, and permitted the establishment in their country of training bases where young Muslim militants could be instructed in the art of Islamic Jihad. But when al-Qaeda began to be involved in attacks on neighboring Arab governments – notably, an attempted assassination of Egyptian President Mubarak in 1995 – Sudanese authorities decided that it was better to send bin Laden and his organization on its way (1996). At this point bin Laden and his organization moved part of their operations to Afghanistan, where the Taliban allowed al-Qaeda to set up new training camps. Meanwhile, next door in Pakistan, bin Laden's operational headquarters drew vital and increasing (but secret) support from Pakistani governmental and military officials who wanted to see Pakistan look less Secular Anglo and more Sunni Arab in profile. Al-Qaeda's goals were from the very beginning to spread Islam to the world by whatever means necessary, replacing Western influences (whether Secular or Christian) with Islamic domination (the Sunni version of Islam, of course). Early on it became involved in all sorts of very violent bombings and assassinations, such activities soon becoming its well-recognized professional hallmark. Besides its military training camps in Afghanistan and in the tribal lands of Pakistan, it set up cells of jihadist "operatives" in cities all around the world, training young men (and women) in the art of suicide bombing (to the glory of Allah, the great rewarder of suicidal jihadism). And al-Qaeda infiltrated mosques everywhere, demanding the preaching of a very militant version of Islam. In a way, it found itself in competition with Iran (Iran being the fatherland of Shi'ite Islam) to see whether Sunni or Shi'ite Islam would be the first to conquer the world. 2It is important to note that the old British border, the so-called Durand Line of 1893 between Pashtun Afghanistan and Pashtun Pakistan has never been respected by the Pashtun, who in this mountainous border region tend to honor no government at all anyway, Afghani or Pakistani.
|
In late February of 1993 a van parked in the parking garage of the North Tower of the World Trade Center exploded, knocking out six stories of the building, killing six people and injuring over a thousand others. It had been parked in such a way that it was intended to knock the North Tower over onto the South Tower and bring both down, killing tens of thousands of people. Had the van been parked closer to one of the main supports of the North Tower, the bomb might have achieved its objective. Enough evidence was left behind in the rubble that eventually the trail of conspiracy led back to a number of Muslims trained by al-Qaeda, and advised and financed by the Pakistani al-Qaeda member Khalid Sheikh Mohammed,3 the uncle of the individual, Ramzi Yousef, who actually directed the bombing of the World Trade Center. The trail also led through a couple of American mosques, one in Jersey City and another in Brooklyn, which were led by rabidly anti-American mullahs (Islamic priests). Gradually, one by one, most of the conspirators were found, still in the United States, and arrested. One who got away ended up in an Iraqi prison. Efforts were made to connect the al-Qaeda-directed event to Saddam Hussein, but extensive FBI investigations came up with no apparent connection. Nonetheless, al-Qaeda now came to the top of the list of terrorist organizations that American authorities were watching closely. 3Khalid Sheikh Mohammed would also be the mastermind of the second or 9/11 attack on the World Trade Center's two towers in 2001.
|
The World Trade Center in New York City
Khalid Shaikh Mohammed, upon
capture – March 2003
He also masterminded the
second attack on the Twin Towers on 9-11, 2001
... as well as other attacks
on Western society
Ramzi Yousef – nephew of
Khalid Shaikh Mohammed
and operational leader of the 1993 WTC
attack
The attack on American embassies (1998) In August of 1998, American embassies in Dar es Salaam (Tanzania) and Nairobi (Kenya) were extensively ravaged in bombings in which 212 people were killed. The CIA quickly identified al-Qaeda, (actually its Egyptian branch, Egyptian Islamic Jihad) as responsible for the bombings. In response Clinton immediately ordered cruise missile strikes on Afghan and Sudanese targets where al-Qaeda had either training camps or supposedly bombing supplies. Ultimately nothing much came of the American response, except a large outcry from a lot of Arabs.
|
The U.S. Embassy in
Dar es Salaam, Tanzania,
in the aftermath of the
August 7, 1998, al-Qaida suicide bombing
"The U.S. Embassy in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, in the aftermath of the August 7, 1998, al-Qaida suicide bombing. Eleven Tanzanians, including 7 Foreign Service Nationals, died in the blast, and 72 others were wounded. The same day, al-Qaida suicide bombers launched another near-simultaneous attack on the U.S. Embassy in Nairobi, Kenya, which killed 218 and wounded nearly 5,000 others" |
The U.S. Embassy bombing in Nairobi, Kenya – August 7, 1998
American retaliatory attacks
on al Qaeda training camps in Afghanistan
and supposed supply depot in
the Sudan – August 20, 1998
"1998 satellite image released
by the U.S. Government of an Al-Qaeda training camp
at Zhawar Kili, Afghanistan
that was later bombed during Operation Infinite Reach"
"1998 US Government
photograph
shows a suspected bioweapons production facility
in Shifa, Sudan that the
U.S. destroyed in the wake of terrorist bombings
of the American embassies
in Kenya and Tanzania that year."