|
The 2016 race for the US presidency The election – November 2016 ... and reaction The massive "anything-but-Trump" movement across America The textual material on this webpage is drawn directly from my work America – The Covenant Nation © 2021, Volume Two, pages 446-451. |
|
The critical role of celebrity status
One thing very noticeable about the 2016 electoral campaign was how much the world of American politics had been taken over by political amateurs ... but amateurs with considerable celebrity status thanks to the omnipresent electronic media, from the television networks to the personal smartphones carried by every "woke" American. The American media had by this time clearly become the kingmakers of America. True, this started with Obama, who acquired the American Presidency back in 2008 with almost no serious amount of national political experience, but with much media attention, not just appearing as a key speaker at the 2004 Democratic National Convention but more importantly through the strong political endorsement given Obama many times by Oprah Winfrey on her widely-viewed television show. From this point on, media attention, not
actual political professionalism built up through years of public
service, would serve frequently in achieving and holding American
public office. The 2015-2016 Republican Party debates and presidential primaries This was clearly the case in how the Republican Party chose to select its presidential candidate for the 2016 presidential campaign. By early 2015 some 17 individuals had announced themselves as Republican candidates for the office of the U.S. presidency, and in early August 2015 Fox News hosted not one but two debates, with the more popular candidates speaking at the second debate. Further debates were held monthly and then in the first three months of 2016 two or three debates each month. But the very first of the debates was the most-watched, and set the tone for the subsequent debates, with Donald Trump dominating the proceedings. Although Trump had no experience serving the people in any kind of public office, and was not an experienced debater, his fourteen years serving as TV host (The Apprentice/The Celebrity Apprentice) made him comfortable in front of the cameras – challenging others personally. He was also quite ready to interrupt his fellow debaters in launching demeaning commentaries on them from the sidelines while the others were attempting to deliver their own messages, much in keeping with the central style and famous slogan of his TV program: "You're fired!" Some found this aggressive style extremely "vulgar.'' Others found it "honest." But it certainly kept the cameras focused on Trump. Consequently, one by one, the other Republican candidates dropped out of sight in the running, pushing Trump ahead in the race. Then with his large win in the Super Tuesday primary elections (12 states voting on March 1, 2016), Trump pulled way ahead of his competitors, and then with the even bigger win in the Indiana primary election in early May (2016) the remaining candidates, Senator Ted Cruz of Texas, Senator Marco Rubio of Florida and Governor John Kasich of Ohio were, for all practical purposes, out of the race. Trump at this point was the clear winner in the long Republican Party competition.
The 2015-2016 Democratic Party contest Clinton had resigned from her position as head of the State Department back in February of 2013, at that point devoting her energies to directing the Clinton Foundation – focused primarily on developing women's rights globally. But those years also saw her busy fending off Republican efforts to undercut her politically because of the Benghazi fiasco and the discovery of her use of her private email accounts to send confidential messages, in violation of Department of State policy. Basically she held up well under the accusations. At the same time, she was preparing herself for another run at the U.S. Presidency, gathering massive campaign support and hitting the speaker circuit extensively. Her only serious opponent within the Democratic Party was the Vermont Senator, Bernie Sanders, an avowed Socialist with all the political instincts Socialism stands for. Actually, the race was intense and Sanders did surprisingly well, indicating how far America had moved away from its traditional Middle-Class cultural roots.1 Hillary had tremendous support from major corporate donors (such as the billionaire George Soros), as well as Blacks and Hispanics, and of course, women. Sanders' support came from younger, White, and more small-town Americans, as well as the more independent-leaning of Democrats. But in any case, from a very nearly equal start at the beginning of primary season, Clinton began to pull ahead of Sanders in gaining pledged delegates – and arrived at the Democratic National Convention in Philadelphia in July of 2016 with approximately a 20 percent lead in the delegate count, ensuring an easy ride for her to the Democratic Party nomination. The Trump-Clinton contest Initially in the public opinion polls, Clinton enjoyed a large lead over Trump. But political troubles on the part of both candidates began to impact those numbers. Clinton was hurt by the congressional investigation going on at the time concerning her emails. And Trump was hurt by accusations leveled against him concerning the publishing of tapes in which years earlier he had used sexually explicit comments about some women. Policy differences were discussed at the various televised debates between Clinton and Trump. But scandal seemed to occupy the interest of the media more. Also statements made by Trump, such as his announcement that the wall he intended to build at the border with Mexico to keep out illegals he would get Mexico to pay for, seemed quite ridiculous and offered the press spectacular headlines and editorials, which clearly helped place the vast majority of American media (normally Liberal anyway) in the camp strongly supporting Clinton – and opposing Trump equally strongly. So enthusiastic was the media for Clinton as the next American President, that it was caught completely off guard by the actual results of the election, results that the media was not at all expecting. 1Middle-Class
Americans were noted for their strong support of the political idea
that success in life is achieved through individual initiative and
personal responsibility – rather than on the basis of a dependency on
the offerings that larger society "owes" individuals as their personal
entitlements, entitlements always paid for by someone else. This
"something for nothing" or "everything for free" was viewed by
Middle-America as the grandest political deception of all offered by
ambitious political demagogues. To Middle-America, such Socialism
always leads to a horrible condition of personal dependency on the
state for whatever favors come to the people – a very destructive
undermining of personal freedom, one which also invariably leads to the economic and spiritual collapse of the community.
|
The unwieldy number of
Republicans come to explain themselves at the CNN debate
September
2015
By March 3, 2016, at the 11th
Republican debate, the number of Republican contenders
was down to four: Marco
Rubio, Donald Trump, Ted Cruz and John Kasich
(with – as usual – Trump dominating
the conversation)
By the time of the opening of the
Republican National Convention in Cleveland on July 18,
Trump was clearly the
frontrunner
Donald Trump and Mike Pence at the Republican National Convention – July 20, 2016
The
Democrats
|
The election results of the vote on November 8th were that with only about 55 percent of the eligible voters turning out to vote, Donald Trump received 63 million votes (45.9 percent of the total of those voting) to Hillary Clinton's 65.9 million votes (48 percent of the total). But Trump had shaped his campaign aiming not at the popular vote but at the way the electoral college was weighted. Thus he gained 304 or 56 percent of the electoral votes to Hillary's 227 or votes. Another 4.5 million votes went to the Libertarian Party (generally considered a party of the Right) or 3.3 percent of the popular vote, 1.5 million to the Green Party or 1 percent of the popular vote (definitely a party of the Left) and 2.3 million going to other parties. Thus the claim that Hillary won the majority of the vote was itself not correct, though she did receive the plurality, as did her husband back in 1992 when he won the presidency with only 43 percent of the popular vote. The claim also that the country voted Left rather than Right is also not exactly accurate, the way the Greens and the Libertarians acted as "spoilers" actually indicating a rather even split between overall Left and Right loyalties of the electorate. Combining the Green Party vote with the Democratic Party vote, the total would be 67.4 million votes. Combining the Libertarian Party vote with the Republican Party vote, the total would be 67.5 million votes. In any case, what ultimately mattered was the vote of the electoral college, performing exactly the role that the original Framers of the constitution had intended for it in the selection of the Federation's President.
|
President Obama and President-Elect Trump meet in the Oval Office two days after the election
Trump taking the oath of office,
with his wife Melania holding the Bibles
on which he pledged his
service
The swearing-in with Donald
Trump, his wife Melania, his son Donald, Jr., his son Barron,
his daughter Ivanka, his
son Eric, his daughter Tiffany, and Supreme Court Chief Justice John
Roberts.
Donald and Melania Trump at the LibertyBall on Inauguration Day
|
The outrage of the Left over the election results
Immediately, protests broke out across the country against the election and its results, protests registering outrage rather than any particular political purpose – except occasionally a call to do away with the "unfairness" of the electoral college system itself. Mostly the protests, such as the youth-focused "Not My President" march which broke out across not only America but across other countries around the world, were simply reactions to the fact that Trump represented everything that America had come to detest as a result of the "change" in American politics and culture carefully put in place by Obama over the previous eight years. In the eyes of the angry protesters, Trump stood as the outrageous symbol of "toxic masculinity," "White privilege" and "homophobia" – social traits that Obama and his followers in the media and on the political Left had come to proclaim as the great evils undermining the nation's true social-cultural progress. There were even immediate calls from Democratic congressmen/women for Trump's impeachment, occurring before Trump had even taken office the following January (2017), an impeachment therefore whose legal foundations were entirely lacking. But it was all very reflective of the sheer emotional outrage that shaped this extremely negative reaction of the American Left to Trump's election. To the Democrats, Trump was out to destroy America, or at least the America that Obama had worked so hard to build. Trump needed to be destroyed before he undid all of the "change" achieved during Obama's eight years in office. And anything that would bring Trump down would serve the cause. Anything. Indeed, Inauguration Day provided not only focus on the new President, but also on the many demonstrations protesting Trump's coming to office. Likewise on the following day, a huge protest of pink-clad participants in the Women's March, carefully organized by a popular Facebook page, took place. The main march took place in Washington, but also in other American cities, and even in hundreds of other cities around the world. This was intended to spark a 100-day campaign of women around the world to end male tyranny – Trump automatically the very living symbol of that tyranny Long-established political courtesies vital to democracy disappear Only once before had America experienced such a reaction to a presidential election – when the South withdrew from the Union after Lincoln's election. Now decades later a similar hostile reaction in the American political arena was indicative of how deep the division had dug itself within American society, in no small part due to Obama's program of change. Actually, this anti-Trump reaction resembled the way elections are conducted (if held at all) in most Third-World countries. Groups that don't like the results of an election form in violent protest hoping to negate the effects of the election by chasing the victor from office. This of course makes a total mockery of the whole electoral process. But this "Third World" maneuver was exactly what was now taking place in America. This same behavior now happening in America should have made this a matter of deep concern to the country, a concern arising not just because of the protests, but even more seriously, because of this immediate call for Trump's impeachment. Where had the long tradition gone of a gracious acceptance of the results by the loser and a moving on in preparation for a future round of elections? The idea that an election itself should be negated because one party in the election did not for whatever reason like the results jeopardized the very integrity of the concept of electoral rather than factional politics. Worse, the inability of leaders of the Left to urge caution against this new political tendency, or even understand its dangers, threatened seriously the moral foundations that American politics had long been built on. Instead, the leaders of the Democratic Party themselves seemed to be looking forward to a grand legal lynching of the new President, as if it somehow were their sworn duty. In any case this would serve to distract greatly the work of the Presidency, of Washington politics itself, over the coming years. But that was the general purpose of all this turmoil (similar to what the Democrats did to Nixon in order to undercut his fairly successful policy in bringing America out of its huge Vietnam mess and gaining a huge re-election vote in 1972 as a result): keep the President so busy defending himself from political attack that he could not effectively conduct the business of his office. Putin must have been smiling from ear to ear in watching all this! Trump's own political style does not help his cause
Of course, political graciousness is a
two-way street, a key feature of American national politics that Trump
himself seemed totally unaware of. Trump already had distinguished
himself before the media by coming at his Republican primary opponents
with phrases like "Little Marco" (Marco Rubio) or "Lyin' Ted" (Ted
Cruz). About Republican opponent Jeb Bush, he had this to say:
And his very demeaning statements about other politicians, even members of his own party, were also highly damaging to his own future need for political support. Concerning John McCain: . . . not a war hero, he's a war hero because he was captured. I like people that weren't captured.While all this simplistic reduction of complex social issues to the ranks of being mere slogans served to energize his following, it deepened even further the understanding of those who were not part of that group that they had the huge responsibility on behalf of the nation to take down this "nitwit." Indeed, McCain would turn into one of Trump's dedicated political enemies. But there would be other Republicans not very happy having to deal with Trump in the White House. In any case, to Trump's many adversaries, he was an enormous danger to the integrity, safety and strength of the nation. He had to go. And thus the immediate crusade for impeachment.
|
Anti-Trump post-election march - St. Paul, Minnesota, November 9
Anti-Trump chain of purple-clad protesters along the Golden Gate Bridge on Inauguration Day
The anti-Trump Women's March in Washington, DC on January 21st
The anti-Trump protest in front of San Francisco's City Hall on February 4th
"Not My Presidents Day" demonstration headed toward the White House – February 20th