by Miles H. Hodges – The Covenant Nation The post-war fear of a rising Communism At the end of World War Two in 1945,
Old Europe was devastated … with Stalin’s Soviet Russia in military occupation
of the eastern half of Europe – and most unwilling to go home. Russia had been
constantly assaulted from the West ... by Napoleon and his French troops in
1812, by the Germans and Austrians in 1914, and most recently by Hitler’s Nazi
troops in 1941. The Stalin’s Russians fully
intended, at all costs, to hold on to all this East European buffer territory
that their troops occupied in order to protecting themselves from another such
assault from the West. Indeed, Stalin
also intended to extend that Russian realm of protection if possible all the
way to the Atlantic across Western Europe ... through the militancy of the
large Communist parties in the West, huge labor-based organizations (coupled
with numerous “progressive” intellectuals) that were quite willing to place
themselves under Stalin’s command. At the same time, the Americans, who
had just gone through this horrible war in Europe (and in the Pacific) were
most insistent about going home at war’s end … though President Truman did
everything possible to keep enough American power employed in the western half
of Europe to keep it from falling into Stalin’s Soviet Russian expansionist hands. America was the sole country to possess an
atomic bomb … and Truman's well-demonstrated readiness to use that bomb if
seriously challenged was a very effective deterrent to Soviet ambitions in the
West. But Marshall Aid moneys in helping
rebuild West Europe's economies … and the formation of the North Atlantic
Treaty Organization (NATO) in 1949 all seemed to stalemate the East-West
conflict. But that fear extended inward as well But by 1950 things seemed to be
unsticking … stirring a deeper alarm back in America about the way the Cold War
was developing. Several things that hit the American political scene at about
the same time shook America deeply. First was the claim of the
Congressional House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC) that a number of
highly-placed (and also highly educated) civil servants had been offering their
services as spies to Stalin. This revelation was shocking to loyal Vets. But to make matters worse, the American
intellectual community tended to side with the accused against HUAC’s “horribly
misguided” efforts to destroy these fine gentlemen (holding some of America’s
highest academic and professional credentials).
Particularly galling to them was the persistence of Congressman Richard
Nixon in his efforts to uncover such spying in high places ... putting Nixon
forever on the intellectuals’ list of public enemies they were resolved to
bring down at their earliest opportunity (it was too dangerous at the Then there was the matter of the
sudden and most unexpected attack of Communist North Korea on “democratic”
South Korea (the latter having actually had UN-authorized elections to pick
their leadership) in mid-1950. Truman was quick to move American troops in
occupation in Japan to South Korea ... and then call other Americans to service
to drive the troops not only of a Communist North Korea out of the South ...
but also to fight off masses of troops of a newly Communist China that had
joined the battle against American efforts to free Korea of this horrible
scourge. This stiff opposition in Korea easily
identified itself to Americans as a grand Communist example of the intent of Russia,
its ally North Korea, and now also Communist China to destroy the world’s
democracies. America was now fully awake
and fully involved in a most vicious Cold War fought against expansionist
Communism. To make matters even tougher for
Americans, the recent revelation that Soviet Russia was now also in possession
of nuclear weapons (Americans thus no longer had a monopoly in the ownership of
this most terrifying weapon) was shocking to the core. And most shocking was the
revelation that some members of America’s own scientific community had actually
helped in developing Soviet atomic capabilities. Tragically, a politically slimy US Senator McCarthy exploited this paranoia fully to further his own flagging political importance ... to the point that during the first half of the 1950s he seemed to have a very nervous America under his flamboyant political grip. He played his political hand by pushing the assumption that he alone knew the deep extent of the Communist intrusion into the higher ranks of American society ... and he alone would bring such traitors to exposure and ultimate destruction. Very unfortunately, the Vets were willing to believe him ... and support him, even if only from a cautious distance. Senator Joe McCarthy affirming the vast invasion of Communism into American society Actually, McCarthy had no such
information, and made up what he could by way of details when challenged,
although all the way up until 1954 no one was really willing to challenge him seriously
... for he was able to make it appear that any such challenger was actually
acting as a hated Communist agent. Even
President Eisenhower refused to go after him. The political-social-cultural effect of
such Cold-War hysteria Sadly, all of this political dynamic
would come to have deeply damaging effect on America socially and
culturally. Most obviously at this point
it would cultivate a deep distrust and disrespect between intellectual America
and Vet America ... one that would never be healed. During the 1950s the bitter standoff would
favor the Vets. But with the coming of
the 1960s, intellectual America would be able to reassert its leading role in
American society ... and actually begin the undercutting of Vet America ... or
“Middle America” as I like to term that particular political culture. And it would always be done in the name of
“progress” (or as Obama would eventually term it, simply “Change). The goal was to free up America from such
American “fascism” as Vet America exemplified. For instance, the play The Crucible, written by a very bitter playwright
Arthur Miller Not surprisingly the play did not do
well in the 1950s. But when the 1960s
rolled around, the play was brought back out for performance ... and was so
well received by a fast-changing America that the play itself soon became
required reading in nearly all American high school literature classes. It was a sign of how deeply political
fortunes were changing as the 1950s moved into the 1960s. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |


Miles
H. Hodges