DAVID HUME

(1711-1777)

CONTENTS
GO TOHume:  An Overview
GO TOHis Life and Works
GO TOHis Major Ideas
GO TOHume's Writings

HUME:  AN OVERVIEW

Hume was a Scottish empiricist--well known for his skepticism and sharpness of thought.  Being a freethinker, he was easily critical of  thinking which rested on no other basis than traditional argument.  He also was sharply critical of thinking which did not arise from the observation of  actual behavior (empiricism) but which was merely speculative in nature (rationalism).

Yet at the same time he was a quietly confident and serene individual who was deeply comfortable with the world--and rather conservative in his social and political views.  Even his own skepticism was tempered by his understanding of the human need for some kind of underpinning of custom or tradition in life.

His major philosophical thrust was against the rationalists who were prone to build great intellectual edifices on the foundations of some "self-evident" truths.  He considered such intellectualism as being highly dangerous--likely to lead to polemical excesses (as the highly intellectually charged revolutions of France in 1789 and Russia in 1917 were certainly to prove in the years after Hume).  To Hume, custom--which was the sum of actual human experience--was the only healthy foundation on which to build human life.

Being an empiricist, he was impressed with the patterns by which people actually lived out their lives.   Hume felt that we should pay close attention to the human record of our actual or "natural" (as he put it) behavior in order to draw conclusions about life.  Hume on the other hand was most unimpressed by the great intellectual "spins" that philosophers wove around hypothetical behavior in building their great systems of thought.  For Hume reality was in the doing, not in the hypothesizing about life.

Thus we remember Hume for his skepticism about our views on God, our great systems of religious truth, the validity of "objective" ethical systems, even the claims of science to have established an explanation of all life in terms of cause and effect.  All this was to Hume mere intellectual humbuggery.

Hume's impact lived long after him.  In fact it was Hume that awoke Kant from his "intellectual slumber" (as Kant himself put it) and caused Kant to undertake the task of responding to the challenge that Hume had issued to those who would claim to understand human nature, even life itself.

HIS LIFE AND WORK

Hume's Early Life

Hume was born in Edinburgh, Scotland, into comfortable circumstances.  However his father Joseph died when he was two and he was raised in his mother Catherine's family--a family of lawyers (her father was president of the Scottish court of Sessions), but ones also devoutly Calvinist (an uncle was a Presbyterian pastor).  His very intelligent and independent-minded mother carefully cultivated these same traits in her sons, of whom David was the younger.

At age 12 he entered Edinburgh University, staying until he was 14 or 15 (not an unusual procedure for those times) and then  returned home to continue his studies there. His family urged him to follow the family tradition (his father's as well as his mother's) of the law.  But further formal study revealed that his love was basically for broader philosophical matters--and he turned wholeheartedly to this pursuit.  But his intensity was so great that in 1729 he suffered a nervous breakdown which took him several years to come back from.

His Early Philosophical Works (1734-1742)

But his love of philosophy was not to be denied.  For a while he worked as a clerk in Bristol.  Then in 1734 he traveled to France where for the next several years he simply studied and composed notes on philosophy.  In 1739 he returned to England where he then turned his studies into a major philosophical work, A Treatise of Human Nature.  This came out in three sections in 1739 and 1740.  To his great disappointment there was little notice of his work.  As he put it, his work "fell dead-born from the press."

Nonetheless he pressed on.  His next writing effort, Essays, Moral and Political (two volumes in 1741 and 1742) met with a small amount of success--in part because his language and style were aimed at a more popular level.  On the basis of the acceptance of this work, in 1744 he candidated for the chair of moral philosophy at Edinburgh.  But he was rejected by the Calvinist authorities with accusations of heresy--if not outright atheism because of the contents of his Treatise.

The Wandering Years (1744-1752)

From this point forward for the next seven to eight years years he wandered from job to job as tutor, secretary, minor diplomat.  Nonetheless during this time he continued with his studies, producing in 1748, Three Essays, Moral and Political and Philosophical Essays Concerning Human Understanding. Philosophical Essays was essentially a popular rewriting of book one of the Treatise (he had learned the lesson with his Essays of the importance of lowering the language level to make his ideas more widely accessible) and focused on the issue of human understanding.  Because of a title change Hume himself made in a later edition of this work, Philosophical Essays came to be known as the Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. This publication also included his essay "Of Miracles," and drew upon himself widespread wrath.  Three years later (1751) Hume published Enquiry Concerning Principles of Morals--which was a rewrite of book three of the original Treatise.

Hume the Historian (1752-1762)

In 1752, after having again been rejected for a professorial position (at Glasgow) because of his reputation for atheism, he was appointed librarian of the law library in Edinburgh.  Here among all these volumes he was to take up a new love--history--and began to put together a History of England.  This came out in 6 volumes between 1754 and 1762--and were very well received because of its elegant style, its unprecedented objectivity and its coverage of the broader socio-economic aspects of English life over the centuries.  Indeed, so well was it received that in 1760 a French and in 1762 a German translation of the History was written. (Indeed, his History was to undergo 50 editions over the next century and be considered the standard for history writing during that period).

Recognition as a Major Philosopher

He not surprisingly continued during this same time with his first love--philosophy.  In 1752 he published Political Discourses--which within two years was given two French translations, so well was it received there.  He also turned to the task of rewriting book two of the Treatise, which came out in 1757 as Four Dissertations.  This latter work included also a study of the "natural history" of religion--a major contributor to the decision of the Vatican in 1761 to place all his works on the Index of banned books!

Diplomatic Life in Paris (1763-1766)

In 1763 he journeyed to Paris with the Earl of Hertford to become secretary to the British embassy there.  His fame now was well established in intellectual circles and he found easy entry into Paris society.  Though Hume had no sophisticated polish to recommend himself, he was of such a gentle and joyous nature that he charmed Paris.

The Rousseau Episode (1766)

In 1766 he returned to England, bringing with him Jean-Jacques Rousseau--to help him establish a new life after his political banishment from his home in Berne Switzerland.  But Rousseau was in a darkened mood at this point and soon began to suspect some kind of conspiracy by Hume against him.  Stealing back to France, Rousseau there denounced Hume publicly for treachery.  To clear the record, Hume was constrained to publish (with commentaries) their mutual correspondence:  A Concise and Genuine Account of the Dispute between Mr. Hume and M. Rousseau.

His Last Years (1769-1776)

In 1769--tired of life in the faster lane in England--Hume returned again to Edinburgh and to the company of numerous friends.  At this point his major work was issuing subsequent editions of his History of England and several editions of a collection of some his earlier writings entitled Essays and Treatises.

Very shortly before his death in August of 1776, he finished an autobiography--quite detached in its handling of his own life--entitled The Life of David Hume, written by Himself.  This finally reached publication the following year--thanks in part to his good friend, Adam Smith.

It was not until after his death that a work that he had held back since the mid 1750s was finally published (in 1779), Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion, because of the furor it was expected to stir up.  Three years later in 1782, two other long-delayed essays were published:  one on suicide and one on immortality.   The reaction was appreciably hostile.

HIS MAJOR IDEAS

On Human Understanding

The foundation of all of Hume's philosophical works is unquestionably his theory on how it is that we come to understand things.  In his original Treatise on Human Nature (1739-1740), the first book was devoted to this very question.  Indeed, his popular rewrite of that work, Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding (originally Philosophical Essays--1748), is what unquestionably established him as an outstanding philosopher.

Impressions and Ideas

As with Locke and Berkeley before him, Hume thought that our awareness or perception of reality was a result of external objects acting upon our senses.  For Hume the most basic, the most direct and the strongest of such perceptions comes in the form of impressions upon our minds.  These are such things as "hot," "wet," "red"--but also such things as "pleasant" or "hostile,"  These impressions excite our emotions in the most basic sort of way.

For Hume there is also a secondary order of perceptions: ideas.  To Hume's thinking, ideas are caused by impressions or assembled from impressions in the mind.  Ideas are reflections of impressions--ones that linger on after the event, more considered, less emotional, even less sharp or distinct than the original impressions that gave rise to the ideas.  More abstract ideas indeed may be--but they are still derived from the realm of perception.

Even Ideas Are Rooted in the Realm of Actual Perception

For Hume, there was no such thing as an a priori idea, born entirely within the inner recesses of human logic or the human soul--as the rationalists proposed.  True, for Hume there was no question that ideas could become fanciful--and thus at a bit of a remove from the realm of direct perception.  But still for Hume even fanciful ideas originated out of the world of actual perception.

For Instance:  The "Reality" of Angels

Take for instance the idea of an angel:  though Hume would claim that no one has ever seen an angel, he indeed agreed that we can all conceive of one--not because angels have some kind of transcendent existence, but because we have seen people and we have seen wings and thus our minds can create a composite idea of a person with wings.  But our being able to conceive of such an angelic being--even as a clear thought (as per the rationalists for whom a "clear thought" was proof of its truthfulness)--did not establish in the estimation of Hume the actuality of angels!  For Hume, the complete empiricist and skeptic, until we could actually produce an angel, one able to be perceived by ordinary human facilities, common sense should tell us that belief in angels was merely the product of our credulity, not of our wisdom.

On Religion

The implications for religion were quite clear (and it's important to note that Hume, who disliked controversy, tried to leave his thoughts on these subjects in the realm of "implications"--at least until after his death when his thoughts then could be put forth much more directly).  To Hume, there was absolutely no solid reason for a belief in supernatural beings or supernatural places--except for the human desire to draw comfort from the possibility that such benefactors and such rewards awaited troubled life.  In that sense Hume was okay with religion--recognizing its "utility" as a civilizing agent.  But such utility would never cause Hume to say that therefore religious beliefs as such were true.

On Science's Law of Cause and Effect

If it seems that he was being a "heavy" in his skeptical handling of rationalist philosophy and of Christian theology, he was no less a "heavy" in his assault on the metaphysics of modern science.  He basically agreed with Berkeley that all we know of reality is what is in our thoughts.  We have absolutely no way to validate what is "out there," what it actually is that our senses behold.  All we can speak of with certainty is what we perceive, the impressions and ideas that we hold.

Then he took this skeptical thought even one step further.  Indeed, we have no way of getting into reality out there to say with any degree of absolute certainty that the appearance of one thing or event causes the appearance of another thing or event.  We cannot say that because we can not get into those supposed "causes" to demonstrate how it is that they cause other things to happen.  We can only say that there is some kind of probable relationship between two related events, in the sense that one event is usually accompanied by another event.  This is not to say that the one, however, caused the other.

The Post Hoc Fallacy

This is the classic argument concerning the post hoc fallacy. Post hoc ergo propter hoc ("following this, therefore because of this) as a fallacy can be summed up with the example of the medicine man who in the month of March dons a green outfit and dances around a bit, pronouncing mysterious incantations, and doing a little of this and a little of that--all very necessary acts needed to bring the greening of the trees that his outfit represents.  And indeed, if we observe carefully, his enactment was quite necessary--for within a couple of weeks the first sign of green comes on the trees and then they break forth into the dazzling light green of spring--all because the medicine man did his all-important dance.

Hmmm!  Obviously some of us are not convinced.  Just because one event always follows the other, that does not necessarily mean that one produced the other!  This was the crux of Hume's argument about science's law of cause and effect.  We cannot say that because two events typically follow each other in some type of succession that one causes the other.  We cannot get into the actual structure of an event to prove that.  As empirical observers destined to see only the reflection of things and events we can only affirm their coincidence--not their causal relationship.  Thus Hume had to remain skeptical in the face of science's proofs of this thing or that.  His skepticism was indeed comprehensive!

On the Realm of Belief

Of course we humans do have to make certain assumptions about life.  Hume did not feel that this was bad.  He just wanted to make sure that it was grounded in some degree of empirical proof.  Thus when we saw that the ground outside our home was quite wet it would have been a safe belief of ours that it had recently rained--even though we had not directly witnessed the event.  This was the realm of beliefs that Hume found reasonably acceptable--provided that we understood them as beliefs and not established fact.

Needless to say, he was not willing to go beyond what could be demonstrated empirically to give credence to beliefs.  And this was where he got himself constantly in trouble with his culture.  His skepticism was always an affront to the belief system of his time.

His Theory of Morality

Here too Hume was the skeptic in the face of "proofs" of the absolute value of this or that moral theory or ethical precept.  But being a social conservative his own skepticism was at times highly troubling to him.

He really outlined the utilitarian doctrine (which Bentham was soon thereafter to pick up) in his view that what motivates people is the perception of well-being that some thing or some event brings them.  A person will seek after that which attracts them and will naturally avoid that which repels them.  Each person will have his or her idea of what that constitutes--and thus such ethical values are entirely subjective and not at all objective as the rationalists and the theologians of his day asserted.

This did not mean that Hume felt that everyone should "do his own thing."  To the contrary, the only demonstration that something was good or bad was not in how one person might view the matter--but how, over the longer run of human experience, over the broader field of human life, actual experience demonstrated that this or that precept worked better to produce the perception of well-being among the people.  (Actually this was not a new view--but went back as far as at least Epicurus in the late 4th century BC.)


 

HUME'S WRITINGS

  Hume's major works or writings:

A Treatise on Human Nature
(1739)
Essays, Moral and Political (2 vols.: 1741-1742)
    Of Superstition and Enthusiasm (1741)
    Of the Liberty of the Press (1741)
    Of the Delicacy of Taste and Passion (1741)
An Inquiry Concerning Human Understanding (1748)
Political Discourses (1751)
History of England (6 vols.: 1754-1762)
Four Dissertations (1757)
    Essays On Suicide And The Immortality Of The Soul
    The Natural History of Religion
    Of Tragedy
    Of the Passions
Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion (1777)


Continue on to the next section:The Renaissance andReformation (1400 to Mid 1600s)Go to the history section: Europe during the Early 1700s
Returnto the Home Page: The Spiritual PilgrimReturn to the Home Page: The Spiritual Pilgrim

  Miles H. Hodges