BENEDICT (BARUCH) SPINOZA 

(1632-1677)



CONTENTS
GO TOSpinoza:  An Overview
GO TOHis Life and Works
GO TOHis Major Ideas
GO TOSpinoza's Writings

SPINOZA:  AN OVERVIEW

Spinoza was a free-thinking individual who lived an a rather intolerant time.  He grew up as a Jew in the Christian Netherlands--but found his first encounter with intolerance was within his own Jewish community, which itself was not tolerant of his non-conforming theology.  He was a pantheist--seeing God in everything.  He was a moral relativist, who did not believe in some set of transcending religious or civil laws that we ought to conform ourselves to, but who instead believed in following out our own natural personal imperatives--that noone else had a right to pass judgment on.

This was not a philosophy designed to make the religiously conservative community around him very happy.  But it certainly spoke to those souls who were tiring rapidly of the mean spiritedness of the religiously orthodox--a growing number of youthful minds who hoped to rise to truths which were vastly higher than the traditional variety that had brought Europeans to war against each other mercilessly.

 

HIS LIFE AND WORKS


His Youth

Spinoza was born in 1632 in Amsterdam of a Jewish family that had moved to the Netherlands from Portugal to escape persecution.   He was given the Hebrew name "Baruch," meaning "blessed," which translates into the Latin as "Benedictus."  He grew up in comfort--for his father was a prosperous merchant.  But his mother died when he was only 6 years old.  He attended a local Jewish school where he was taught a Hebrew curriculum--from the Talmud, to mathematics, to Jewish mysticism.  At age 11 his father died--and his stepsister laid claim to the entire family fortune.  Thus Spinoza was on his own at an early age.

Excommunication from the Jewish Community (1656)

He attended a Jewish high school in Amsterdam, where one of his teachers was Rabbi Manasseh ben Israel--the same individual who was able to work out with Cromwell the re-entry of Jews to England.  In school his freethinking ways got him in trouble with his very orthodox Jewish teachers.  He was at heart a skeptical humanist with respect to the teachings of the Jewish scriptures.  He would not accept certain of the biblical stories as being literally true--and viewed Moses as having been no more exceptional than any other enlightened leader of the past.

At age 18, he moved in with a teacher, Francis van den Enden, a former Jesuit, and helped him out with his teaching duties.  During this time, he developed his abilities in Latin and Greek, cultivated the logical method of the neo-scholastics, and was introduced to the teachings of Rene Descartes.

Finally in 1656, at age 23, after repeated attempts by the synagogue leadership to get Spinoza to conform his thinking to orthodox ways--and to move away from the influence of van den Ende--he was excommunicated from Judaism.

He was free-thinking, yes--but not indifferent to the opinions of his Jewish community.  He tried to restore the broken relationship with his Jewish community.  But could not find any common ground or point of entry back into full standing in his Jewish society.

He also at this time began to apprentice as a lens grinder, building telescopes, microscopes and eyeglasses.

Entry into Secular Philosophical Studies (1660)

And during this time he cultivated a circle of friends who delighted in discussing the religious and philosophical issues of the day (heavily shaped by Descartes).  Spinoza found himself becoming more deeply interested in these matters--and in 1660 he moved to a village outside Leyden, Rijnsburg, (a gathering place of Cartesian scholars) to devote more time to his thoughts.

His First Philosophical Works (1662)

He moved in with Hermann Homan, and in the Homan cottage Spinoza began to write philosophy.  By early 1662 he had put together Korte Verhandeling van God, de Mensch und deszelfs Welstand (Short Treatise on God, Man and His Well-Being)--from notes he had begun to assemble in his Amsterdam days--and Tractatus de intellectus emendatione (Treatise on the Improvement of the Understanding)--originally intending both writings to be a part of a single work.

He also at this time wrote the first book of a more ambitious project, Ethica (Ethics).  He also was a prolific letter-writer, remaining in contact with his study group in Amsterdam--and taking up a 15-year correspondence with Heinrich Oldenburg, a secretary of the British Royal Society.

His Commentaries on Descartes (1663)

The writings of Descartes formed the focal point of his labors during this time--as Spinoza was deeply involved in teaching and writing either in support or refutation of Cartesianism.  His work was becoming widely recognized--even a philosophical circle had been formed to study his works.

From this circle in 1663 came the request for him to publish his commentaries on Descartes' major work, Principia, as a book of his own, Renati des Cartes principiorum philosophiae (Philosophical Principles of Rene Descartes).

 He Develops the Methodology for the Ethics

In the meantime he was working on systematizing his own philosophical thoughts and readying them for print--as part of his Ethica project.  He decided against the dialogue form of philosophical writing and instead employed the use of proofs drawn up in the manner of geometry.   So...for the next two years, during which time me moved in 1665 to Voorburg (near The Hague), he concentrated on finishing the Ethics (in full:  Ethica ordine geometrica demonstrata).

The Tractatus theologico-politicus (1670)

But just as he was nearing completion of this work, he turned his attentions to another work entitled Tractatus theologico-politicus, which he published in 1670.  He had been under criticism since his youth concerning his free-thinking ways and he felt compelled to write the Tractatus in order to answer accusations, direct and indirect, that thoughts such as his posed a threat to the intellectual and spiritual integrity of his society.  As he contemplated the completion of the Ethics his thoughts were turning to the question of its receptivity--especially given the mood of intellectual intolerance he was feeling around himself.

Indirectly, he was hoping to set the record straight about a number of misconception floating around him.  He did not see himself as an atheist (though he was quite distinctly a pantheist).  He felt strongly that his commentaries on scripture were given in the very spirit of scripture itself.  Indeed, he felt most strongly that to try to curb free spiritual inquiry was itself in violation of everything that scripture teaches.  Thus the Tractatus was written in order to answer the deep intellectual intolerance which seemed to permeate the culture around him.

In the same year of the publication of the Tractatus Spinoza moved to the Hague--where he would live out the rest of the years of his rather short life.  Again he delayed publication of the Ethics and turned his thoughts to writing a Hebrew grammar.  But this too he did not complete, turning instead back to further work on the Ethics.

Political Dangers

Politics intervened to shape aspects of his life at this point.  Spinoza had come under the approval of one of the Dutch magistrates, Jan de Witt, and through his support had been able to bring the Tractatus out for publication.  When in 1672 de Witt was murdered, Spinoza was both outraged--and greatly endangered by his demonstrating that outrage.  Friends convinced Spinoza not to speak out, but remain silent.  Life without a political patron was more dangerous than ever.

Also, though the Tractatus had been well received since its publication in 1670, in some parts it was met with intense anger--within both the Jewish and Christian communities.  His enemies were numerous, and influential.  Nonetheless when he was invited in 1673 to take up the Philosophy Chair at the University of Heidelberg, he refused.  He wanted to focus his efforts on the continuing development of his philosophical system.

Further--in his naivete, Spinoza in 1673 decided to take it upon himself to travel to Utrecht, then under occupation by French troops of the ambitious Louis XIV, to negotiate a peace between the Dutch and the French.  When he returned empty-handed to the Hague, his enemies were loud in their suspicions of treachery on Spinoza's part.

Thus the times were not right for the publication of the Ethics--even though it had definitely come to completion in 1675.

His Early Death (1677)

But now his health was failing.  Having too long breathed the glass dust from his optical work his lungs were weakend and finally became diseased.  On February 20, 1677 he died and four days later was buried in Spuy at the New Church.

Ethics Published Posthumously (1677)

Thus it was only after his death that the Ethics finally underwent secret publication in Amsterdam.

HIS MAJOR IDEAS

His Geometric Methodology

In most every respect Spinoza's philosophy looks over its shoulder constantly at Descartes.  Like Descartes, Spinoza is entirely Rationalistic, that is, truth moves deductively from fundamental or a priori truths, to truths that can be derived logically from those fundamental truths:  "If X is true then it also holds that Y must also be true, because ...."

Like all Rationalists, Spinoza builds his system of philosophy not on anything that is verifiable by actual experimentation or any other "checking out" of his ideas in the actual world around us.  In his thinking this world is highly suspect because we cannot be sure that what we perceive is actually true.  All we can know for sure are our thoughts--and whether they are built on sound logic--or on illusion and faulty thinking.  Like all Rationalists, Spinoza hopes to establish Truth entirely through the rigors of his logical method--all developments occurring within the world of pure thought.

This works fine in the realm of geometry--because all things are true, because they are true by their very definition.  To a Rationalist this is an appealing approach to truth. But problems develop when we begin to talk about things, especially about the actual existence of things.  Now we are no longer working in the hypothetical world of mathematics--but in the actual world of things in existence, even such intangible things as "God."  We know that our system of philosophy works if our original propositions are true.  But how in the world can we demonstrate that our original propositions are true--so that we can then build up the rest of our philosophical system of truth?  Descartes struggled with the idea--until he came to (he thought) the irreducible and indisputable proposition:  I exist--I exist because I am even now thinking about my existence.  This must be true.

Maybe--but not necessarily.

God as Pure Substance

Spinoza saw this break-down in Descartes' thoughts.  And he presumed to be able to build a better logical system of philosophy--by starting not with his own existence (as per Descartes) but with the proposition that (by definition) existence exists.  Existence exists in the form of pure substance--which works out to be Spinoza's definition of God.  (Having this definition is why Spinoza claimed that he never was an atheist!).

To Spinoza, substance is the source of all else in creation--from it all else is derived ("created" as the Judeo-Christian community put it).  Pure substance is the origin of all else.  It is the only thing not created--but is its own cause.  This is definition #1 in Spinoza's system.  It is a fundamental truth--true for Spinoza simply by definition (as all geometric truths must start out.)

Having started his logic out this way, he cannot formulate a God who is anything else but pure substance.  Such a God can have no persona--such as we find in the created world.  Such a God can have no feelings of his/its own--but simply must be what its own existence requires it to be.  God cannot have a will or design--but simply is design.

Further, such a God can have no transcendence--cannot exist apart from or above creation itself--because Spinoza identifies God with the very essence of creation.  God is the impassive essence or substance of all that is--beautiful perhaps, and to be adored by loving humans.  But God himself/itself cannot love, cannot act out of grace or a sense of mercy--nor out of any autonomous judgment.  To Spinoza--the traditional Jewish and Christian view of God was simply a crude anthropomorphism, or assigning human qualities to God (because we find it more comforting to think of God in such familiar terms).  He would have no part of such a theology.

There is little wonder that his critics called him a pantheist--because that is exactly how he saw the universe:  infused with the very substance of God.  That includes human thought itself--if it moves purely out of the necessity of its own being.  In this state we are participating in the essence, very substance of God.

Human Ethics as a Matter of Natural, Personal Imperatives

To Spinoza, good and bad are determined not by some sort of transcendent ideals, some code of law that we all must aspire to, but out of the very logic of our personal being, a quality which will differ somewhat from person to person.   This moral logic is a matter of the integrity of our thoughts and our actions.  We are to ask ourselves--is this action appropriate to who I am or what I am?  Is it useful to me, given my true nature?

There can be no set of high ideals to which we are all to aspire, but only the set that works for us, one by one, given who we are as individuals.  We are to live by our own natural, personal set of imperatives--knowing all the while that others must live by their own natural sets of imperatives which may or may not be like ours.  We cannot judge others by our own norms.  In fact we really cannot judge others at all--unless we do so entirely from a sympathetic viewpoint where we are able to evaluate things from their viewpoint.  To hate someone else is the worst kind of breakdown in our moral thinking.  To be able to identify with others is the highest moral achievement.

To Spinoza this is why the principle of intellectual and spiritual tolerance was of the highest order of things.

Reverence for God

Likewise, it is highly inappropriate for a person to hold God to human judgment--for God is neither good nor evil but simply the essence of all things and conditions as they necessarily are.  God does not cause evil to fall on us--nor is God capable of instituting good where there is evil.  God simply has the capability of being--as all things are.

Our relationship with God then, as with our neighbor, is to come to a full sympathy with God, an ability to think as God thinks--which is something akin to possessing scientific knowledge about things so as to be able to anticipate their movement or thought.  Our highest religion is to come to share God's thoughts with him--and to find a deep satisfaction, strength and peace in being able to do so.  In this sense, and in this sense alone, do we come into the "eternal life" that Christianity and Judaism have long talked about.

SPINOZA'S WRITINGS

  Spinoza' major works or writings:
Korte Verhandeling van God, de Mensch und deszelfs Welstand
    (A Short Treatise on God, Man and his Well-Being) (1662)
Tractatus de Intellectus Emendatione
    (On the Improvement of the Understanding) (1662)
Renati des Cartes principiorum philosophiae
   (Philosophical Principles of Rene Descartes) (1663)
Tractatus Theologico-Politicus (1670)
Ethics (1677)


Continue on to the next section:The Renaissance andReformation (1400 to Mid 1600s)Go to the history section: Europe during the Second Half of the 1600s
Returnto the Home Page: The Spiritual PilgrimReturn to the Home Page: The Spiritual Pilgrim

  Miles H. Hodges