2. GETTING STARTED IN AMERICA
|
| THE PLYMOUTH PLANTATION |
But it had not been an easy time in Leiden for these English "Pilgrims", as only some of them
possessed technical skills that could find work there, the rest being simply of
a farming background and thus having to take menial jobs just to survive. Also these Pilgrims wanted to retain their
English identity, which seemed to hold less importance among their youth, who
were taking up the Dutch language and its more libertine ways. And Dutch politics was bringing them under
pressure, as the English King James was leaning on the Dutch authorities to
suppress the English Separatist communities taking refuge in their land … at a
time that the Dutch needed English support in the face of ongoing Spanish
efforts to defeat the Dutch and force them back into Catholicism.
Thus
after ten years at Leiden, the Pilgrims knew they had to move
on.
The Plymouth Plantation and the Pilgrims. Finally, the English refugees chose to make
that move to North America, despite the horror stories concerning the "dying
times" that accompanied all English attempts at settlement there. They had a social ideal as a "Reformed"
Christian community to live up to, in America if need be. And they would meet this responsibility no
matter what the cost might be. They were
like soldiers going off to war, except their war was in service to God, not any
king, not any bishop, not any such human authority.
Tragically, these Pilgrims suffered a huge delay in their
departure (a leaking ship forced them to return to port, then try again) and
consequently they arrived late in the season (November) at a destination in
America that proved to be well north above where they were assigned to
settle. Also, the prevailing winds that
had blown them north of their course prevented them from heading south along
the American coast to that intended destination (the Hudson River area). Thus they were stuck there at Cape Cod – just
as winter set in upon them.
But
they were determined to make the most of this unexpected situation. Thus before they disembarked from their ship,
they created a covenant (the Mayflower Compact) among
themselves, covenanting to work together as a community.[1] And then they set out to do just that.

The pilgrims' landing
(actually considerable exploration by search parties occurred
before families left the Mayflower)
Nonetheless these Pilgrims persisted – and finally that spring
they were able to put into place a permanent settlement, a plantation they
named "Plymouth."
[1]The Mayflower Compact reads: In
the name of God, Amen. We whose names
are underwritten, the loyal subjects of our dread Sovereign Lord King James, by
the Grace of God of Great Britain, France and Ireland, King, Defender of the
Faith, etc.
[2]Today’s Secular-Humanist historians mention only that the Pilgrims
came to America to find freedom, as if this were some Hippie venture. They fail to mention that the Pilgrims came
to find the freedom to worship God the way they knew God expected of them. Religious freedom is thus not mentioned, only
freedom, as if that alone (with no greater purpose behind such freedom) would
have led these Pilgrims to stake their lives on such a dangerous venture.
Having
undertaken, for the Glory of God and advancement of the Christian Faith and
Honour of our King and Country, a Voyage to plant the First Colony in the
Northern Parts of Virginia, do by these presents solemnly and mutually in the
presence of God and one of another, Covenant and Combine ourselves together
into a Civil Body Politic, for our better ordering and preservation and
furtherance of the ends aforesaid; and by virtue hereof to enact, constitute
and frame such just and equal Laws, Ordinances, Acts, Constitutions and
Offices, from time to time, as shall be thought most meet and convenient for
the general good of the Colony, unto which we promise all due submission and
obedience. In witness whereof we have
hereunder subscribed our names at Cape Cod, the 11th of November, in the year
of the reign of our Sovereign Lord King James, of England, France and Ireland
the eighteenth, and of Scotland the fifty fourth. Anno Domini 1620.
THE PURITAN "GREAT MIGRATION" TO MASSACHUSETTS (1630-1642)
John Endecott – Governor
of the earliest (and relatively
unsuccessful) Puritan colony at Salem in Massachusetts
But
another attempt was made that same year, one which would be amazingly
successful – due to the excellent leadership of John Winthrop and the accompanying
leadership team of equally talented and deeply dedicated Puritan pastors and elders.

Winthrop and company arrive at Massachusetts
Some of the ships John Winthrop
brought to New England,
anchored in Boston harbor – by William F.
Halsall

Some Puritan fathers: John Cotton Richard and Saltonstall

Thus stands the cause between God and us. We are entered into
covenant with Him for this work. We have taken out a commission. The Lord hath
given us leave to draw our own articles. We have professed to enterprise these
and those accounts, upon these and those ends. We have hereupon besought Him of
favor and blessing. Now if the Lord shall please to hear us, and bring us in
peace to the place we desire, then hath He ratified this covenant and sealed
our commission, and will expect a strict performance of the articles contained
in it; but if we shall neglect the observation of these articles which are the
ends we have propounded, and, dissembling with our God, shall fall to embrace
this present world and prosecute our carnal intentions, seeking great things
for ourselves and our posterity, the Lord will surely break out in wrath
against us, and be revenged of such a people, and make us know the price of the
breach of such a covenant.
In short, they were going to attempt to do in America what Calvin had achieved in Geneva.
Winthrop and his assistant Dudley having a disagreement Winthrop was actually nobly born to a
father who was a lawyer, landowner, and Cambridge University director, who
opened similar doors to John in his development. After graduating from Cambridge, John became
Lord of the Manor at Groton and then eventually a member of his father's law
firm in London.
[3]This is why Harvard College was founded in 1636, only six years after
their first arrival in America. They
needed pastors faster than what Cambridge University back in England was able
to provide them. Note that Virginia
would not take similar action until 1693 when the College of William and Mary
was established, in part finally to train Anglican priests.
Now
the only way to avoid this shipwreck, and to provide for our posterity, is to
follow the counsel of Micah, to do justly, to love mercy, to walk humbly with
our God. For this end, we must be knit together, in this work, as one man. We
must entertain each other in brotherly affection. We must be willing to abridge
ourselves of our superfluities, for the supply of others' necessities. We must
uphold a familiar commerce together in all meekness, gentleness, patience and
liberality. We must delight in each other; make others' conditions our own;
rejoice together, mourn together, labor and suffer together, always having
before our eyes our commission and community in the work, as members of the
same body. So shall we keep the unity of the spirit in the bond of peace. The
Lord will be our God, and delight to dwell among us, as His own people, and
will command a blessing upon us in all our ways, so that we shall see much more
of His wisdom, power, goodness and truth, than formerly we have been acquainted
with. We shall find that the God of EstIsrael is among us, when ten of us shall
be able to resist a thousand of our enemies; when He shall make us a praise and
glory that men shall say of succeeding plantations, "may the Lord make it
like that of New England." For we must consider that we shall be as a city
upon a hill. The eyes of all people are upon us. So that if we shall deal
falsely with our God in this work we have undertaken, and so cause Him to
withdraw His present help from us, we shall be made a story and a by word
through the world.
John Winthrop –Puritan New England's Founding
Father. Indeed, Winthrop was the "Calvin" to New England, the one
above all others who directed the course of Puritan Massachusetts to its success
as a grand religious or social experiment, on quite new and untested
principles. It was Winthrop's sense of vision and his
optimism that kept New England on course.
It was Winthrop who helped steer the course
of this development between the dangerous rocks of religious fanaticism on the
one hand and heavy-handed religious legalism on the other. And as with all true leaders, he did so by
setting the example himself of the kind of humble, self-critical behavior
needed by all in order to produce the spirit of mutual cooperation that the new
society needed in order to thrive. He
inspired others to higher behavior – rather than use his social office to
dominate and control the behavior of others.
And although he sincerely loved those he was responsible for, he was not
one in need of their constant approval.
Ultimately, he was answerable only to God – as Winthrop reminded his followers that
they too were. They were all to live by
the counsel of God (prayer and Bible study), and that alone. Winthrop was to them merely an
advisor, not their judge.
And they loved
him for it.
over Dudley's unnecessary adornements to his house.
Winthrop insisted on keeping things simple – and equal.
John
was also profoundly Puritan in his beliefs, relying on
his Christian faith to get him through the death of two wives and then the
growing problems as a Puritan with the reign of King
Charles.
When as a Puritan he was removed from the Court
in 1629, he was then free to take the lead in the development of the
Massachusetts Bay Company, using his own finances to help assemble the fleet
necessary to bring the first 1000 Puritans to America, be willing to face
personally the well-known challenges of life in America by leading that voyage
himself, and recruit other Puritan pastors to the same risky
mission as leaders in the towns and villages that would constitute Puritan New England. And thus it was
that America was blessed to have the New England colony come under such
splendid leadership. Winthrop was a gift of God to
America.
"Democratic" small-town Massachusetts. Massachusetts Bay Colony would take
on a character very, very different from Virginia. The New England soil was rocky and the
forests thick – not suitable for huge plantations to develop. Besides, from the very beginning this was
never intended to be an economic venture – nor the path to social status. Many of those coming to New England were in
fact leaving behind quite respectable social status in order to start a new
life in America. And they would be
living at a social level fairly equal to everyone else making the trip. Upon arrival they would be assigned plots of
land just large enough to support a hardworking family, these land allotments
arranged in such a way as to form a small village, centered on a town square
equipped with a meeting house which would serve the village as both church and
town hall. And each village would have a
seminary educated pastor[3] whose job
was to help guide the village as it attempted to live out its new covenant
life.
When the available plots of land for a village were fully
distributed, then another village, normally to the west, would likewise be
surveyed and subdivided into fairly equitable plots of land for distribution to Puritan newcomers. And so the Massachusetts colony slowly spread
its way ever westward.
Thus
it was that Christian religious refuge – not improved economic status – was the
theme that not only brought those Puritans to New England but also became the
moral-cultural underpinning of the entire venture. This had very little to do with what was
going on way to the south in Virginia.

Puritans did not celebrate Christmas ...
because of its non-Biblical or pagan Roman roots
(Easter was their big holiday)
To the surprise of moderns,
the Puritans enjoyed their beer
(water was not reliably a healthy drink at the time)

Life in Boston – 1660s
Life in the typical Puritan village
RHODE ISLAND AND CONNECTICUT
Roger Williams - arrived at Massachusetts and assigned several
pulpits but could never find the "purity" he sought in the colony
and was thus forced to start up his own "Providence" colony
in 1635-1636
Thomas Hooker and his followers move to Connecticut – 1636
Hooker's departure from Massachusetts was deeply regretted by
| TROUBLES WITH ANNE HUTCHINSON |
Actually, women holding such study groups attended
by both men and women – and giving strong opinions on various matters – was not
the uncommon event these historians pretend it to be. Rather, she was expelled because she loudly
and unrelentingly put forth a claim that, through a prophetic voice given her
by God himself, she could see clearly that all the pastors of the colony –
except her beloved pastor John Cotton – were in fact serving the "anti-Christ,"
the Devil himself.
In
serving as this highly negative prophetess, she had succeeded in gathering a
circle of discontented souls (discontented for one reason or another), and thus
threatened to split the still-fragile colony into antagonistic factions. Realizing that she was set on destroying the
fragile social order holding this colony together, the authorities (including Winthrop) told her that she had to
leave the colony. That punishment was
mild in comparison to the damage she would have caused the colony if she had
been allowed to continue her "prophetic" denunciations of the colony
and its social order.
But
ironically (and tragically) the curse she had pronounced on the Massachusetts
colony at her departure ultimately fell on her and her family instead when, in
the Dutch colony to which she eventually moved (she was even moved on from
William's Providence Colony in Rhode Island!), they were murdered in an Indian
attack.
| RELATIONS WITH THE INDIANS |
At
first these conflicts tended to be merely local, although still a matter of
life and death for those involved. Such
was the case of the conflict with the Pequot tribe (1636) which involved
both the English and their Indian allies in a war against the Pequot, which step by step became
increasingly bloody for both sides as battles raged back and forth. In the end the war basically destroyed the
entire tribe – whose members fled, were killed, or were enslaved.
But
the bloodiest battle ever fought between the English and the Indians –
bloodiest in the long history of Anglo-Indian relations because of the highest
percentages of deaths on both sides during this war – took place in 1675-1676
when the once-friendly Wampanoag came under the leadership of an individual
known to the English as King Philip – who went on the warpath against the huge
Anglo community which now reached deeply into Indian territory (all the way to
Springfield in today's Central Massachusetts).
A coalition of Indian tribes at first were very successful in the
conflict, burning and slaughtering English settlements everywhere – even
reaching as far east as the Plymouth settlement at the Cape and the once-friendly
Providence, Rhode Island (the latter which the Indians burned to the
ground). But in the end the Indians
began to receive the worst of the deal, having missed a growing season and
facing a hard winter ahead of them.
Indians began to surrender as amnesty was offered to those who did – starvation,
disease or the possibility of enslavement or slaughter as the alternative. And little by little the war ground to a halt
finally by the following August.


The
problem with the arrival of the European to their land was that socially and
technologically, the Indians were now hugely outmatched by these new contenders
for the privilege of land ownership. The
Indians were a people still living at the level of early Neolithic life, whose
economic mainstay of hunting and fishing was supplemented only by rudimentary
levels of farming. Thus the land could
support only very small, widely scattered Indian communities. The Europeans, on the other hand, were
commercial farmers, capable of clearing sufficient land to produce farms able
to support comparatively huge numbers of individuals. And thus it was that the European intruders
into the Indians' traditional hunting grounds would come to vastly outnumber
the Indian population of the area.
Ten Europeans for every Indian killed in battle
over the land would be required to keep the two different populations in some
kind of balance or stalemate. And try as
the Indians might, they simply were not capable of reaching such numbers in
their wars waged against the intruding Europeans. Besides, the Europeans came well equipped
militarily. Indian bows and arrows were
serious weapons; but European muskets were just as deadly and more easily
brought to skilled use by the European commoner who was less the warrior and
more the farmer, but a dangerous foe to the Indian nonetheless. Also, the Indians had so long been
adversaries among themselves, tribe against tribe, that it was difficult for
them to find the unity necessary to offer joint resistance to the
European. Indeed, at first some Indians
tribes saw the Europeans as useful allies against their traditional tribal
foes.
Thus
it was that history was set against the Indian in this contest with the
European for the land. It would be a
cruel contest, cruel for both sides of the contest. But in the end, it was the destiny of the
European to win this all-important battle for the land.
Indian Territories – and
Indian and colonial settlements of
significance during King Philip's War
– 1675-1676
Wikipedia - "Raid on
Deerfield"
The Indian massacre of the
white settlers
at Deerfield, Massachusetts – 1704
Pocumtuck Valley Memorial
Association

Miles
H. Hodges