2. GETTING STARTED IN AMERICA
|
| MARYLAND |
George Calvert (Lord Baltimore), a recent
English convert to Catholicism, saw a double opportunity in securing land in
America, both as a way to enrich his family fortunes and as a religious refuge
for fellow Catholics. In 1629 he
petitioned Charles I for a tract of land in
which to establish a settlement along the Chesapeake Bay just north of Virginia
[he had given up on a similar venture in Newfoundland because it was simply too
cold there!] – but died before a land grant was awarded him by the king. His son Cecil then took over the project,
receiving a royal charter in 1632 – despite the opposition of the Virginians
who claimed the same land as part of their colony.


The
venture, beginning with only a couple of hundred English settlers in 1634,
started off smoothly, with no starving time or trouble with the local
Indians. In the area where the
Marylanders first laid out a town (St. Mary's) the local Indians befriended
them because they themselves were in need of allies against their own Indian
enemies. The Indians sold them the land
they first settled and also corn to feed the colony. And soon the rich Maryland soil had the
Marylanders producing enough food to easily feed the colony.
Indeed, in most respects Maryland differed very little
from its neighboring colony next door (Virginia). Tobacco was the main crop, at first worked by
indentured laborers – and then over time by
slaves. The colony was dominated by an
aristocracy, set up from the outset by the Calverts, who gave large land grants
to family members and fellow English gentry.
This, as in Virginia, created in Maryland a distinct upper class that
stood socially far above the common dirt farmers who then came to Maryland as indentured workers.
| THE CAROLINA COLONY |
The Carolina colony – and Shaftesbury as its cultural-spiritual
leader. In 1663, soon after his coming to the throne,
Charles II granted a group of English noblemen (which included also Berkeley) a huge section of land to
the south of Virginia – in theory reaching all the way to Spanish Florida. The land was termed "Carolina" in
honor of Charles's father, Charles I (from the old Latin name from which
Charles derives, Carolus).
Taking
the lead in this venture was another outstanding (and unusually virtuous – at a
time when being virtuous could be politically very dangerous) Founding Father,
Anthony Ashley Cooper, Earl of Shaftesbury.
As
the individual taking the lead in developing the Carolina colony so as to best
serve its settlers, he enlisted the help of the famous English social
philosopher and personal friend (and personal in-residence physician), John Locke. He asked Locke to design a legal order for the
colony, one that would make it a shining example of a society based on human
reason rather than on just religious or political interests (the kinds that
were tearing England apart at the time).

[1]Shaftesbury and his fellow Whigs precipitated the Exclusion Crisis when in 1679 they introduced
into Parliament the Exclusion Bill, in the attempt to block the pro-Catholic
James’s future accession to the English throne.
The Whigs were also demanding that royal authority be placed under the
discipline of a written constitution, a shocking idea in the days of royal
absolutism. Opposing the Whigs were the Tories, supporters of James and defenders of the doctrine of royal
absolutism.
As
it turned out, of course, Locke's design had to be scrapped
when reality struck: the varying lay of
the land, the varying quality of the soil, and the problems of finding defense
against highly resistant Indians, made for a reality which did not submit well
to the beautiful plans of "enlightened" Idealism.<
As for Ashley (soon to be named as the Earl
of Shaftesbury), he continued to find himself in the middle of a very bumpy
political world, especially after he played a leading role in creating the Whig
Party,[1]
infuriating the arch-royalists – the Tories – in the process. He would be arrested (1681), flee England
(1682), and would die in Amsterdam early the following year, because this was
one issue he simply could not find the path of political reconciliation to go
down.
But as for the Carolina colony that he had given so much of
himself to get started on solid ground, it did prosper. The harbor at the Charleston site proved
economically advantageous in its service to the rural hinterland – and
individuals of all sorts of cultural background flocked there – including a
good number of French Protestants (Calvinist Huguenots) chased out of France when
in 1685 King Louis XIV revoked the Edict of Nantes, the
century-old promise of Protestant rights in France.
Thus Charleston became the South's first true city.
NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY
The centerpiece of Dutch New Netherland:
"New
Amsterdam" (today's New York City )
A
1660 map of Dutch New Amsterdam showing Wall Street
and the Bowery ("Farm") to the right
British Museum, London
New Jersey. What came to be called New Jersey was also
part of the Dutch territory awarded to James in 1664. But
he turned around and in 1665 awarded
sections of this huge feudal estate to personal supporters of his own,
George Carteret and Virginia Governor Berkeley's brother John
(the Carterets were also involved in the development of the Carolina
colony at
that same time). Ultimately William Penn
also became part of the New Jersey project when Berkeley sold his
shares to Penn, who was looking to provide a place of refuge for
fellow Quakers (Penn was himself a recent convert to this new and
quite unusual version of Christianity).
Quakers had come under considerable attack for their peculiar ways (thus
the name "Quakers" – for their behavior when they became overcome by
the Holy Spirit) – and like the Puritans of New England and Catholics of
Maryland, they needed a place of refuge.[2]


[2]The Quaker movement was started up in the mid-1600s by an English
shoemaker and shepherd, George Fox, who
did not believe in original sin (nor the need for the atoning death of Jesus on the cross), but instead emphasized the divine favor awaiting
any person who simply sought the “inner light” that God had placed in each and
every person, letting that inner spirit lead that person to righteousness. Clergy were unneeded in this process, only
communal gatherings at which one or another person was moved to speak whenever
led to do so by that inner spirit.
This approach to
Christianity deeply upset many "normal" Christians, although
interestingly Cromwell found himself sympathetic to and thus protective of the
Quakers during the reign of his Commonwealth (the 1660s). This was when Penn
joined the group. And in America,
Providence colony leader Roger Williams
accepted this group into his colony, where they soon came to make up half the
population – the other half being mostly Baptists (Puritans opposed to the idea
of infant baptism, because to the Baptists, baptism signified a quite adult
decision to follow Christ).
PENNSYLVANIA

Behind
this spiritually welcoming society was the personal sensitivity of the colony's
founder, William Penn.
As a youth Penn had shown a rather strong
philosophical bent, rather than an ambition to perform great military service,
of which the family was highly respected (his father was a leading admiral in
the royal navy, and also one of the key agents arranging for Charles's return
to the throne). But the young Penn had a heart for serving instead
the poor, especially those devastated by the return of the Plague in 1665 and
the Great Fire of the following year which destroyed most of London, increasing
enormously the misery of the poor. This
had led Penn to associate himself with the
Quakers, who were offering help to exactly those devastated by these tragedies,
bringing upon himself an eight-month prison sentence for his Quaker connections (the first of many
such prison terms), despite his family's own prominence.
But
two things were to keep Penn's spirits up, despite the
considerable political opposition his work brought him. On his deathbed, Penn's father acknowledged the
remarkable integrity of his son, and told him never to betray what his
conscience knew to be true. And
secondly, at this point Penn came into enormous wealth, which Penn then put to use to promote the Quaker cause, and thus his
involvement in Quaker settlement in the American
colonies.
Penn would be one of the few colonial
backers to actually come to his colonial holding in America to personally
supervise its development, everything from the layout of his precious
Philadelphia (built on a grid pattern at the junction of the Schuylkill and
Delaware Rivers) to the political order (the Pennsylvania Frame of Government)
which would guide the colony down its welcoming path. And he was generous in his offer of financial
compensation to the Indians for the land, blessing his colony with peace with
the Indians as a result.
A 1683 "portrait" of Philadelphia by Thomas Holme
Equally
sadly, he would die not knowing how well his Philadelphia would serve as
something of a national spiritual capital, uniting the various American
colonies during the dark days (1770s and 1780s) of their struggle to maintain
their independence from an overbearing English king. Nor would he know how America would quickly
come to honor greatly the integrity in Penn that the country has long
understood as the very groundwork of its own existence – and its larger purpose
in the world.
Thus it was that Penn's colonial venture contributed greatly to the
growing notion that America was a land not of government restriction and
social-cultural conformity, but of true opportunity for those willing to come
and work hard to build their own world – in full cooperation with others of
different political and religious ideals.
So he too helped greatly to make America a "City on a Hill," a "Light to the Nations."
| GEORGIA |
General Oglethorpe meets with the Yamacraw Indians
upon his arrival at the Georgia colony (1733)
Yet the colony did provide the South its second city
after Charleston, an Atlantic port named Savannah – located at the mouth of the
Savannah River and well laid out on a beautiful grid pattern.

Miles
H. Hodges